Bob Motta on If There Is Enough Evidence for A New Scott Peterson Trial?
Jan 29, 04:00 PM
The name Scott Peterson has resurfaced in the headlines, stirring up a case that has long been considered closed. The LA Innocence Project has taken up Peterson's cause, citing new potential evidence that could suggest his innocence in the murder of his wife, Lacey Peterson. This development begs the question: Could this be a breakthrough in a case many thought was resolved, or is it merely a distraction from the truth?
Tony Brueski, host of "Hidden Killers," sought answers from Bob Motta, defense attorney and host of the podcast Defense Diaries. Motta, with his expertise in legal defense, weighed in on the potential impact of the LA Innocence Project's involvement. "Anytime you get like any of the innocence projects... they're not going to jump into a case if they feel it's completely fruitless," Motta stated, acknowledging the seriousness with which these organizations approach such cases.
The discussion centered around a burnt-out van found a mile away from the Peterson home, containing what appears to be blood, and discovered a day after Lacey Peterson’s disappearance. This van, previously unconnected to the case, now becomes a focal point of the LA Innocence Project’s investigation. Motta expressed initial skepticism but also acknowledged the potential significance of this finding: "I was more... I thought it may have had a better chance of succeeding when I thought that it was related to the van that the burglars that Lacey is supposedly to have happened upon while she was walking the dog."
The conversation also touched on the public perception of Scott Peterson, shaped by his infidelity and the media's portrayal. Motta pointed out the danger of conflating personal character flaws with criminal guilt: "Him being a bad husband, a terrible husband... does not necessarily make him a murderer." This distinction is crucial in re-examining the case, where public opinion may have been swayed by Peterson's character rather than hard evidence.
Motta also delved into the legal intricacies of introducing new evidence through a post-conviction relief act petition. "It's got to be legitimate, you know, and it's got to be compelling," he explained, emphasizing the high bar for such evidence to be considered by the court. The question remains whether the van and its contents can meet these criteria.
The case’s complexity is further highlighted by the challenges of proving that this new evidence was truly undiscovered during the original trial. "If it was there and existed, and [Mark Geragos] just missed it, it's not newly discovered," Motta clarified, underlining the importance of this evidence being genuinely new to have any legal impact.
Brueski and Motta's discussion shed light on the fine line between proving innocence and creating reasonable doubt. The presence of blood in the van, if connected to the Petersons, could open up new avenues for the defense. However, Motta remained cautious, suggesting that even if the blood is linked to the case, it does not automatically exonerate Scott Peterson.
In conclusion, the involvement of the LA Innocence Project in the Scott Peterson case has reignited interest and debate around a case that many thought was firmly resolved. While the prospect of new evidence is tantalizing, its actual impact remains uncertain. As the legal process unfolds, one critical question persists: Will this new evidence unearthed by the LA Innocence Project lead to a dramatic reversal in Scott Peterson's fate, or will it simply reaffirm the verdict that has defined this case for over two decades?
Tony Brueski, host of "Hidden Killers," sought answers from Bob Motta, defense attorney and host of the podcast Defense Diaries. Motta, with his expertise in legal defense, weighed in on the potential impact of the LA Innocence Project's involvement. "Anytime you get like any of the innocence projects... they're not going to jump into a case if they feel it's completely fruitless," Motta stated, acknowledging the seriousness with which these organizations approach such cases.
The discussion centered around a burnt-out van found a mile away from the Peterson home, containing what appears to be blood, and discovered a day after Lacey Peterson’s disappearance. This van, previously unconnected to the case, now becomes a focal point of the LA Innocence Project’s investigation. Motta expressed initial skepticism but also acknowledged the potential significance of this finding: "I was more... I thought it may have had a better chance of succeeding when I thought that it was related to the van that the burglars that Lacey is supposedly to have happened upon while she was walking the dog."
The conversation also touched on the public perception of Scott Peterson, shaped by his infidelity and the media's portrayal. Motta pointed out the danger of conflating personal character flaws with criminal guilt: "Him being a bad husband, a terrible husband... does not necessarily make him a murderer." This distinction is crucial in re-examining the case, where public opinion may have been swayed by Peterson's character rather than hard evidence.
Motta also delved into the legal intricacies of introducing new evidence through a post-conviction relief act petition. "It's got to be legitimate, you know, and it's got to be compelling," he explained, emphasizing the high bar for such evidence to be considered by the court. The question remains whether the van and its contents can meet these criteria.
The case’s complexity is further highlighted by the challenges of proving that this new evidence was truly undiscovered during the original trial. "If it was there and existed, and [Mark Geragos] just missed it, it's not newly discovered," Motta clarified, underlining the importance of this evidence being genuinely new to have any legal impact.
Brueski and Motta's discussion shed light on the fine line between proving innocence and creating reasonable doubt. The presence of blood in the van, if connected to the Petersons, could open up new avenues for the defense. However, Motta remained cautious, suggesting that even if the blood is linked to the case, it does not automatically exonerate Scott Peterson.
In conclusion, the involvement of the LA Innocence Project in the Scott Peterson case has reignited interest and debate around a case that many thought was firmly resolved. While the prospect of new evidence is tantalizing, its actual impact remains uncertain. As the legal process unfolds, one critical question persists: Will this new evidence unearthed by the LA Innocence Project lead to a dramatic reversal in Scott Peterson's fate, or will it simply reaffirm the verdict that has defined this case for over two decades?
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com