Will Rex Heuermann's Wife Asa Ellerup Incriminate Herself in New Documentary?
Dec 07, 2023, 04:00 PM
In the latest episode of "Hidden Killers," hosted by Tony Brueski, a compelling discussion unfolds with Defense Attorney and Host of the podcast Defense Diaries, Bob Motta. The conversation centers on Asa Ellerup, the wife of Rex Heuermann, the alleged Long Island serial killer. A critical element of the discussion is the controversial documentary being produced about Ellerup by 50 Cent's G Unit production team, set to air on Peacock.
Ellerup, who filed for but has not completed a divorce from Heuermann, presents an enigmatic figure. Despite not being charged with any crime, her actions and the impending documentary raise eyebrows. Brueski and Motta delve into the implications of such a documentary, especially considering the ongoing trial of her husband. Motta, with his legal expertise, offers a critical perspective on the situation.
Motta expresses skepticism about the documentary's intent, suspecting it aims to link Ellerup to the crimes or prove her complicity. The documentary, he argues, is unlikely to be a sympathy piece for Ellerup. Instead, Motta sees it as an investigative tool designed to expose any involvement or knowledge Ellerup might have had in her husband's alleged crimes. He warns of the potential pitfalls, drawing parallels to the infamous "The Jinx" documentary, which played a pivotal role in Robert Durst's conviction.
The conversation turns to the recent discovery of Ellerup's DNA on one of the victims, a development that significantly heightens the intrigue surrounding her. This new evidence, if substantiated, could place Ellerup in an incriminating position. Motta and Brueski speculate on the nature of this DNA evidence and its potential implications for Ellerup.
Motta criticizes Ellerup’s decision to participate in the documentary, considering it a grave mistake. He argues that her participation in the documentary, particularly in light of the new DNA evidence, could be detrimental to her case. Motta anticipates that law enforcement will be keen to subpoena the documentary footage, which could reveal crucial details not yet known to the public or the police.
Brueski raises the point that Ellerup has not been officially questioned by the police, suggesting that law enforcement might be biding their time, waiting for her to reveal more through the documentary. Motta concurs, seeing the documentary as a potential goldmine of information for prosecutors.
The conversation highlights the complex web of legal, ethical, and public perception issues surrounding the Heuermann case. Motta’s insights reveal the potential risks and consequences of Ellerup’s involvement in the documentary, especially in the context of the ongoing investigation into her husband’s alleged crimes.
As the discussion concludes, Brueski and Motta agree on the poor optics of Ellerup's decision to participate in the documentary. They emphasize the precarious position she finds herself in, with the documentary potentially serving as a tool for her incrimination.
The interview leaves the audience pondering the intricate dynamics at play in the Heuermann case and the role of media in shaping public perception and potentially influencing legal outcomes. With Ellerup's actions under scrutiny and the documentary's production underway, the case continues to captivate and intrigue, raising as many questions as it answers.
Ellerup, who filed for but has not completed a divorce from Heuermann, presents an enigmatic figure. Despite not being charged with any crime, her actions and the impending documentary raise eyebrows. Brueski and Motta delve into the implications of such a documentary, especially considering the ongoing trial of her husband. Motta, with his legal expertise, offers a critical perspective on the situation.
Motta expresses skepticism about the documentary's intent, suspecting it aims to link Ellerup to the crimes or prove her complicity. The documentary, he argues, is unlikely to be a sympathy piece for Ellerup. Instead, Motta sees it as an investigative tool designed to expose any involvement or knowledge Ellerup might have had in her husband's alleged crimes. He warns of the potential pitfalls, drawing parallels to the infamous "The Jinx" documentary, which played a pivotal role in Robert Durst's conviction.
The conversation turns to the recent discovery of Ellerup's DNA on one of the victims, a development that significantly heightens the intrigue surrounding her. This new evidence, if substantiated, could place Ellerup in an incriminating position. Motta and Brueski speculate on the nature of this DNA evidence and its potential implications for Ellerup.
Motta criticizes Ellerup’s decision to participate in the documentary, considering it a grave mistake. He argues that her participation in the documentary, particularly in light of the new DNA evidence, could be detrimental to her case. Motta anticipates that law enforcement will be keen to subpoena the documentary footage, which could reveal crucial details not yet known to the public or the police.
Brueski raises the point that Ellerup has not been officially questioned by the police, suggesting that law enforcement might be biding their time, waiting for her to reveal more through the documentary. Motta concurs, seeing the documentary as a potential goldmine of information for prosecutors.
The conversation highlights the complex web of legal, ethical, and public perception issues surrounding the Heuermann case. Motta’s insights reveal the potential risks and consequences of Ellerup’s involvement in the documentary, especially in the context of the ongoing investigation into her husband’s alleged crimes.
As the discussion concludes, Brueski and Motta agree on the poor optics of Ellerup's decision to participate in the documentary. They emphasize the precarious position she finds herself in, with the documentary potentially serving as a tool for her incrimination.
The interview leaves the audience pondering the intricate dynamics at play in the Heuermann case and the role of media in shaping public perception and potentially influencing legal outcomes. With Ellerup's actions under scrutiny and the documentary's production underway, the case continues to captivate and intrigue, raising as many questions as it answers.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com