Will Pending Ellen Greenberg Civil Case Uncover Dark Truths About Coverup?
Episode 12, Nov 03, 2023, 03:00 PM
In the shadowy realm of unresolved mysteries, few cases beckon as profoundly as that of Ellen Greenberg. A riveting episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast with Tony Brueski brought to light the baffling circumstances surrounding Ellen's tragic demise and the arduous quest for justice undertaken by her parents. The discussion raises pressing questions about the power dynamics that could be at play and the long-awaited possibility of revealing the truth.
The conversation kicks off with a thought-provoking query, "Are they protecting someone?" This question lingers like a cloud of suspicion over the entire case. As Defense Attorney and podcast host of "Defense Diaries," Bob Motta, contemplates, "When you look at that string of people connected, it could make, it does make a lot of sense. Is that what's happening?"
Ellen Greenberg's story is one of grim intrigue. Found dead with a shocking 20 stab wounds, half in her back and half in her head, the initial verdict of suicide by the Philadelphia Medical Examiner's Office has confounded experts and left many scratching their heads. As Bob Motta astutely observes, "The facts don't beget the ultimate conclusion in terms of it being suicide. It's the concept is absurd to me... No one's doing that."
This case has been a quagmire of challenges from the very beginning, exacerbated by corruption within the Philadelphia legal and political spheres. The question that continues to haunt observers is whether Ellen's parents' quest for justice is merely a losing battle against a formidable system, determined to thwart their efforts at every turn.
The heart of the matter lies in the issue of legal standing. The lower court initially ruled that Ellen's parents lacked the legal standing to challenge the suicide ruling. Bob Motta elaborates, "They never even got to the argument because they just said, look, you don't have standing to bring the claim, you know, which legally they don't, but, you know, the law can change."
This legal stumbling block highlights a fundamental flaw in the justice system. Standing, the right to participate in a legal proceeding, seems to hinder the pursuit of truth in cases like Ellen's. Bob Motta underscores the issue, "It's one of those things where you see the warts of the criminal justice system and kind of the flaws in the system as it exists now you know, and it's frustrating."
As the podcast conversation delves deeper, the focus shifts to the potential avenues for justice. Bob Motta explains how the Greenberg family has filed a civil suit against specific law enforcement officials, prosecutors, and the medical examiner, alleging misconduct and conspiracy to cover up Ellen's murder.
This civil suit is more than just a pursuit of monetary damages; it serves as a beacon of hope for discovering the truth. It raises the intriguing possibility that revelations uncovered during the civil suit's discovery process could lead to a criminal investigation.
Bob Motta breaks it down, "I'm sure it'll be televised like when it gets to that point civilly, you know, because of the potential for it to actually blossom into, you know, something that could produce evidence that would help them get somebody under arrest."
However, this avenue is far from straightforward, and the battle for access to crucial evidence will likely be an uphill one. The civil suit, despite its noble objectives, may still encounter resistance from law enforcement, and the question remains whether it can ultimately deliver the justice the Greenberg family seeks.
As the conversation unfolds, the enigmatic case of Ellen Greenberg raises more questions than answers. Why was her death initially ruled a suicide despite glaring evidence to the contrary? Are there hidden agendas at play, protecting someone from the full force of the law? What changes are needed in our legal system to prevent such cases from being stifled by issues of standing?
The podcast discussion underscores the importance of pushing for change and emphasizes the frustrating limitations of the current legal framework. The Greenberg family's pursuit of justice continues, leaving us with a final, haunting question: Will the truth ever see the light of day, or will Ellen's case remain a symbol of the challenges and mysteries that persist within our justice system?
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The conversation kicks off with a thought-provoking query, "Are they protecting someone?" This question lingers like a cloud of suspicion over the entire case. As Defense Attorney and podcast host of "Defense Diaries," Bob Motta, contemplates, "When you look at that string of people connected, it could make, it does make a lot of sense. Is that what's happening?"
Ellen Greenberg's story is one of grim intrigue. Found dead with a shocking 20 stab wounds, half in her back and half in her head, the initial verdict of suicide by the Philadelphia Medical Examiner's Office has confounded experts and left many scratching their heads. As Bob Motta astutely observes, "The facts don't beget the ultimate conclusion in terms of it being suicide. It's the concept is absurd to me... No one's doing that."
This case has been a quagmire of challenges from the very beginning, exacerbated by corruption within the Philadelphia legal and political spheres. The question that continues to haunt observers is whether Ellen's parents' quest for justice is merely a losing battle against a formidable system, determined to thwart their efforts at every turn.
The heart of the matter lies in the issue of legal standing. The lower court initially ruled that Ellen's parents lacked the legal standing to challenge the suicide ruling. Bob Motta elaborates, "They never even got to the argument because they just said, look, you don't have standing to bring the claim, you know, which legally they don't, but, you know, the law can change."
This legal stumbling block highlights a fundamental flaw in the justice system. Standing, the right to participate in a legal proceeding, seems to hinder the pursuit of truth in cases like Ellen's. Bob Motta underscores the issue, "It's one of those things where you see the warts of the criminal justice system and kind of the flaws in the system as it exists now you know, and it's frustrating."
As the podcast conversation delves deeper, the focus shifts to the potential avenues for justice. Bob Motta explains how the Greenberg family has filed a civil suit against specific law enforcement officials, prosecutors, and the medical examiner, alleging misconduct and conspiracy to cover up Ellen's murder.
This civil suit is more than just a pursuit of monetary damages; it serves as a beacon of hope for discovering the truth. It raises the intriguing possibility that revelations uncovered during the civil suit's discovery process could lead to a criminal investigation.
Bob Motta breaks it down, "I'm sure it'll be televised like when it gets to that point civilly, you know, because of the potential for it to actually blossom into, you know, something that could produce evidence that would help them get somebody under arrest."
However, this avenue is far from straightforward, and the battle for access to crucial evidence will likely be an uphill one. The civil suit, despite its noble objectives, may still encounter resistance from law enforcement, and the question remains whether it can ultimately deliver the justice the Greenberg family seeks.
As the conversation unfolds, the enigmatic case of Ellen Greenberg raises more questions than answers. Why was her death initially ruled a suicide despite glaring evidence to the contrary? Are there hidden agendas at play, protecting someone from the full force of the law? What changes are needed in our legal system to prevent such cases from being stifled by issues of standing?
The podcast discussion underscores the importance of pushing for change and emphasizes the frustrating limitations of the current legal framework. The Greenberg family's pursuit of justice continues, leaving us with a final, haunting question: Will the truth ever see the light of day, or will Ellen's case remain a symbol of the challenges and mysteries that persist within our justice system?
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com